Forums / Developer / Why could anonymous user be required to log in?

"Please Note:

At the specific request of Ibexa we are changing this projects name to "Exponential" or "Exponential (CMS)" effective as of August, 11th 2025.
This project is not associated with the original eZ Publish software or its original developer, eZ Systems or Ibexa".

Why could anonymous user be required to log in?

Previous topic

Developer

Next topic

Author	Message
Piotrek Karaś	Thursday 27 December 2007 2:22:01 am Let's say I have two different siteaccesses. There's also a user with default anonymous role that allows user's logins to <b>both</b> of these siteaccesses. Now, when accessing one siteaccess, user can read content, it works as expected. When accessing the other siteaccess, he doesn't have access to anything and a login form is displayed in the module result instead (without any kernel error notice). <b>What could be the reason for this taking place?</b> The two siteaccesses vary when it comes to their settings, so there may be something missing or misconfigured. I just can't spot anything that would make the key difference. BTW. It's Exponential 4.0.0. Thanks! -- Company: mediaSELF Sp. z o.o., http://www.mediaself.pl eZ references: http://ez.no/partners/worldwide_partners/mediaself eZ certified developer: http://ez.no/certification/verify/272585 eZ blog: http://ez.ryba.eu
Laurent BOURREL	Thursday 27 December 2007 3:12:50 am Hi, If you want that your user be logged in both site accesses, have a look at : http://ez.no/doc/ez_publish/technical_manual/3_10/reference/configuration_files/site_ini/session/sessionnamepersiteaccess I think that you also need the custom sessionnamehandler : http://ez.no/doc/ez_publish/technical_manual/3_10/reference/configuration_files/site_ini/session/sessionnamehandler
Piotrek Karaś	Thursday 27 December 2007 3:27:35 am Hi Laurent, Thanks for the links. What you pointed to is not was I was looking for, but that's some very interesting functionality that I had not known about before, so big THANKS! I've just solved my problem, and ashamed to mention that... [SiteAccessSettings] RequireUserLogin=false was missing... ;) -- Company: mediaSELF Sp. z o.o., http://www.mediaself.pl eZ references: http://ez.no/partners/worldwide_partners/mediaself eZ certified developer: http://ez.no/certification/verify/272585 eZ blog: http://ez.ryba.eu

Author

Message

Piotrek Karaś

Thursday 27 December 2007 2:22:01 am

Let's say I have two different siteaccesses. There's also a user with default anonymous role that allows user's logins to <b>both</b> of these siteaccesses. Now, when accessing one siteaccess, user can read content, it works as expected. When accessing the other siteaccess, he doesn't have access to anything and a login form is displayed in the module result instead (without any kernel error notice).

<b>What could be the reason for this taking place?</b>

The two siteaccesses vary when it comes to their settings, so there may be something missing or misconfigured. I just can't spot anything that would make the key difference.

BTW. It's Exponential 4.0.0.

Thanks!

--
Company: mediaSELF Sp. z o.o., http://www.mediaself.pl
eZ references: http://ez.no/partners/worldwide_partners/mediaself
eZ certified developer: http://ez.no/certification/verify/272585
eZ blog: http://ez.ryba.eu

Laurent BOURREL

Thursday 27 December 2007 3:12:50 am

Hi,

If you want that your user be logged in both site accesses, have a look at :
http://ez.no/doc/ez_publish/technical_manual/3_10/reference/configuration_files/site_ini/session/sessionnamepersiteaccess

I think that you also need the custom sessionnamehandler :
http://ez.no/doc/ez_publish/technical_manual/3_10/reference/configuration_files/site_ini/session/sessionnamehandler

Piotrek Karaś

Thursday 27 December 2007 3:27:35 am

Hi Laurent,

Thanks for the links. What you pointed to is not was I was looking for, but that's some very interesting functionality that I had not known about before, so big THANKS!

I've just solved my problem, and ashamed to mention that...

[SiteAccessSettings]
RequireUserLogin=false

was missing... ;)