Forums / Setup & design / Did the working of roles and policies change in 3.6??

"Please Note:

At the specific request of Ibexa we are changing this projects name to "Exponential" or "Exponential (CMS)" effective as of August, 11th 2025.
This project is not associated with the original eZ Publish software or its original developer, eZ Systems or Ibexa".

Did the working of roles and policies change in 3.6??

Previous topic

Setup & design

Next topic

Author	Message
Bernhard Reiter	Wednesday 15 June 2005 12:58:16 pm Hello, I have a VERY strange problem. I had my site working fine with 3.5. I now upgraded to 3.6 (needed some new features) and now i cannot access my site anymore without logging in (as admin). I have not changed anything in my roles and policies. If i want the anonymous role now to see anything i must change its contet/read limitation from 'Section(Standard)' to 'any'. I first thought i somehow borked up my installation at the upgrade process, but then i tested it with an new instalation and its the same. As long as something is in the standard section it works, but as soon as i create a new section, assign some nodes to it, and grant access to the section for the anonymous role, i get access denied. So my question is has something changed in 3.6 regarding access and roles stuff or am i just really stupid.
Bernhard Reiter	Friday 17 June 2005 5:26:28 am Well, i now made a test with clean installations of 3.5.2 and 3.6.0. And the behavior of 3.6 did definitely change! Its of no more use to assign a section with limitatiosn to an user(group). Instead i have to edit the content/read policy. Still there seems to be no mentioning of it. I think this is a conspiracy ;-)
Paul Borgermans	Friday 17 June 2005 7:15:20 am Oops That's a bug then, please report it in the bug section Regards -paul eZ Publish, eZ Find, Solr expert consulting and training http://twitter.com/paulborgermans

Author

Message

Bernhard Reiter

Wednesday 15 June 2005 12:58:16 pm

Hello,

I have a VERY strange problem.
I had my site working fine with 3.5.
I now upgraded to 3.6 (needed some new features) and now i cannot access my site anymore without logging in (as admin).

I have not changed anything in my roles and policies.
If i want the anonymous role now to see anything i must change its contet/read limitation from 'Section(Standard)' to 'any'.

I first thought i somehow borked up my installation at the upgrade process, but then i tested it with an new instalation and its the same.

As long as something is in the standard section it works, but as soon as i create a new section, assign some nodes to it, and grant access to the section for the anonymous role, i get access denied.

So my question is has something changed in 3.6 regarding access and roles stuff or am i just really stupid.

Bernhard Reiter

Friday 17 June 2005 5:26:28 am

Well, i now made a test with clean installations of 3.5.2 and 3.6.0.

And the behavior of 3.6 did definitely change! Its of no more use to assign a section with limitatiosn to an user(group). Instead i have to edit the content/read policy.

Still there seems to be no mentioning of it.

I think this is a conspiracy ;-)

Paul Borgermans

Friday 17 June 2005 7:15:20 am

Oops

That's a bug then, please report it in the bug section

Regards

-paul

eZ Publish, eZ Find, Solr expert consulting and training
http://twitter.com/paulborgermans