Forums / Developer / which PHP accelerator to use?

"Please Note:

At the specific request of Ibexa we are changing this projects name to "Exponential" or "Exponential (CMS)" effective as of August, 11th 2025.
This project is not associated with the original eZ Publish software or its original developer, eZ Systems or Ibexa".

which PHP accelerator to use?

«

Previous topic

|

|

Next topic

»

Author	Message
Marko Žmak	Saturday 19 December 2009 4:52:33 pm I have searched the forums in order to find a good answer for this question, but all the posts are outdated. So now, with the newest version of eZP (4.2) are there any findings what is the best accelerator to use with eZP? For me there are 3 candidates: Ion Cube APC eAccelerator Which one would be the best? -- Nothing is impossible. Not if you can imagine it! Hubert Farnsworth
Gaetano Giunta	Saturday 19 December 2009 5:21:40 pm APC is the officially recommended one (look up the requirements page for eZP 4.2) Principal Consultant International Business Member of the Community Project Board
Pablo Pernot	Sunday 20 December 2009 2:27:38 am I'm using eAccelerator and it really does a good job. Pablo Pernot http://www.smartview.fr http://www.areyouagile.com
Pablo Pernot	Sunday 20 December 2009 2:29:10 am have a look here : http://pwet.fr/blog/benchmark_between_ez_publish_4_and_ez_publish_3_10_with_or_without_a_php_opcode_cache A page from Damien, from Montpellier, France (as me ;) ) Pablo Pernot http://www.smartview.fr http://www.areyouagile.com
Gaetano Giunta	Sunday 20 December 2009 6:40:35 am As a personal note, I do not think the thing setting apart any of those products (Xcache included, ioncube afaik is dead and buried) is its sheer speed or memory usage. What really matters is stability under heavy load (including opcode-cache purges under access storms). So be prepared to stress test before going live, and to install your 2nd choice if the first one turns out to crash in your setup - I personally have seen all of them crash and burn in at least one particular php installation, so I have no real personal favorite. You can also take into account that APC is maintained by php-language developers, while xcache and eaccelerator are currently a one-person project. It might be important if you like support contracts and long-term platform sustainability. Just google around to see how long it took for those 3 products to support php 5.3 to get an idea... Principal Consultant International Business Member of the Community Project Board
Ekkehard Dörre	Monday 21 December 2009 9:13:58 am Hi Marko, we use APC and it works fine, nice with and without comparison http://serwatka.net/blog/ez_publish_performance_with_php_5_3_0 greetings, ekke http://www.coolscreen.de - Over 40 years of certified eZ Publish know-how: http://www.cjw-network.com CJW Newsletter: http://projects.ez.no/cjw_newsletter - http://cjw-network.com/en/ez-publ...w-newsletter-multi-channel-marketing